Saving "the Market” out of Cambridge: “Transaction Costs”
“Theories
are approximations. Nothing is completely anything,” or so does the
Nobel-laurate Eugene Fama quip. He is very true: At best, laws, principles and theories
in science are approximations across the
space or tendency over the time.
There are two great reasons for such
incompleteness: one is difficulty in specifying and defining the environment;
the other presence of frictions. In conjunction with our economic activities in
general and market trade in particular, the one may be dubbed as “imperfect
knowledge” and the other “transaction costs.”
The law of one price is a rough,
very rough, approximation. First, we do not have the complete knowledge
conducting arbitrage, interspatial, intertemporal or inter-substitutive. For
instance, we do not know for sure prices at Walmart, Trader Joe’s and the other
alternative sellers. Moreover, we have to pay a traffic fare, among other
costs, which eats an arbitrage benefit to a certain extent.
More than clearly, such defects
prevent the community from achieving Pareto optimality. The two of them must be
Public Enemy #1 and #2.
We may think of various types of
transaction costs including the following:
1) We
pay for information about possible
means to the defined end. In addition we need detailed information on potential
partners of trade.
2) We
pay for deal-making in spoken or
written words and implementing a commercial
transaction. These costs may be substantial depending upon nature of the
transaction. Legal fees, if any, must be included in this category as well. In a
war-torn economy, one might need a legion of mercenary for the implementation.
3) We
pay administration costs all through
the process from the beginning to the end of transaction. According to certain
economists, these costs are especially important in association with industrial
transactions at the firm. “Moral hazard” or the “agency problem” is frequently
cited.
4) We
pay transportation costs in time and
money of the household, the object or both. We pay transformation costs including brokerage fees and banking costs to
trade assets or financial instruments for money.
5) We
pay risk premiums. We can in no case
remove uncertainties completely, and consequently we in risk management pay
costs in time, money or both. These are particularly pertinent to
inter-temporal arbitrage which involves the future of everyone’s non-surety.
Needless to say, the costs listed above
are inter-substitutive. As a matter of course in everyday life, we sometimes
interchange information, time, distance or money with one another.
Comments
Post a Comment