Posts

Showing posts with the label AI and job loss

From Cambridge to Eternity: “AI vs. Job Loss 02”

  Hated by the former US president Harry S. Truman, the economy has two hands. Where there is a “take,” there is a “give.” Where there is no “give,” there is no “take.” More generally, where there is an action, there is a reaction and vice versa . Therefore, there in the economy is no such thing as “equilibrium” or ceteris paribus . In other words, an “organism in equilibrium” must be an oxymoron in the worse sense; a life on the Isle of the Dead?             In the first place, none of us in the hat of “the household” of economics would like to be put to “equilibrium” in any sense of the term.   The Concern: “AI and Job Loss ” Don’t worry, be even happier!             Where there is demand for AI, there will eventually be supply of AI. Where there is no demand for AI, there is absolutely no supply of AI in and from the right mind. Scenario #1 . Suppose AI’s...

From Cambridge to Eternity: “AI vs. Job Loss”

  Intelligence, Human vs Artificial            What would the most typical difference between RI (for real intelligence) and AI be? That’s a great question subject to answers of all differences depending on whom we ask the question of. 1)      A macroeconomist : There is a “nominal” difference, if any, in that the two never die in “the short run” but fade away in “the long run.” 2)      A scientist : The one is human and organic, the other artificial and mechanic In other words, RI evolves while AI revolves. 3)      A humanist : The one is exciting and gets excited, while the other is boring but never gets bored. 4)      A troubleshooter : The one goes to a clinic, the other to a mechanic. 5)      A layperson like the rest of us: Are you kidding? 6)      A doomsayer : RI’s will certainly suffer fro...