Procrustean Art of Backtracking: “Equation of William Baumol”
According to a Korean maxim in Chinese characters, “The darkest is right under the lamppost” (燈下不明). Often times, the answer to an age-old trouble is of simple or rather naïve ideas around us for long, sometimes even longer than the trouble in hands.
Getting
out of the popular framework of reference tangled with vested interests, we
often find an incredibly short answer as in:
1) “Eppur si muove.”
2) “The
Emperor in naked!”
3) The
“equation of monetary inventory” by William Baumol (1952) is all that we might
refer to at the very beginning of an
economic downturn.
To “keep things simple,” we copy the
following from somewhere else:
(Quote) The household has to conduct
cost-benefit analysis for the decision how much money to hold (Md): the marginal benefit
is in saving financial transaction costs and the marginal cost is from forgone interests. In this regard, the American
economist William Baumol suggests a clue in the 1952 article. We borrow from
him and slightly revise the equation so as to represent the annual average of the
optimal balance of money at the typical
household:
Md= (b∙T/ 2i)1/2,
where
b is the financial transaction costs
per transformation
T is the annual total of
uniformly-distributed monetary expenditures, and
i is the interest rate (of reference).
This
equation represents the balance of money required of, not preferred by, the
household.
When
we aggregate this equation to the economy where individual differences wash
out, the equation in the same form effectively represent the money stock (Md≡ Ms) at a seasonally adjusted
typical moment of the year. The
interest rate will now become the market-wide level of interest rate instead of
the typical household’s reference rate. …
It may additionally be noted that the
dimensions of terms match and that the nominal interest rate is from the aggregate
asset market as opposed to “the real interest rate controlled by the central
bank.” This Baumolite equation [Md=
(b∙T/ 2i)1/2]
is immune from all the defects in popular macroeconomic models…. (Unquote)
Comments
Post a Comment